<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If IBM buys SUN, whose IAM suite wins?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.identricity.com/2009/03/if-ibm-buys-sun-whose-iam-suite-wins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.identricity.com/2009/03/if-ibm-buys-sun-whose-iam-suite-wins/</link>
	<description>Unconventional news and views on Identity and Access management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 22:27:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: John Havers</title>
		<link>http://www.identricity.com/2009/03/if-ibm-buys-sun-whose-iam-suite-wins/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>John Havers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 08:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.identricity.com/?p=49#comment-5</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s worth considering the real challenge with the IAM suites. As many rightly claim, the major vendors have functional access control and user provisioning suites. An acquisition of Sun by IBM does not address the real challenge of moving those suites to production and delivering sustainable business value. The customers&#039; problem isn&#039;t the availability of tools today - it&#039;s using them, and IBM understands this better than most. Nonetheless, the next few weeks will be very interesting for those of us in this sector. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#039;s worth considering the real challenge with the IAM suites. As many rightly claim, the major vendors have functional access control and user provisioning suites. An acquisition of Sun by IBM does not address the real challenge of moving those suites to production and delivering sustainable business value. The customers&#039; problem isn&#039;t the availability of tools today &#8211; it&#039;s using them, and IBM understands this better than most. Nonetheless, the next few weeks will be very interesting for those of us in this sector.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ab</title>
		<link>http://www.identricity.com/2009/03/if-ibm-buys-sun-whose-iam-suite-wins/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>ab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.identricity.com/?p=49#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the discussion on LinkedIn: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers=&amp;gid=41311&amp;discussionID=2065005&amp;goback=.hom.anh_41311&quot;&gt;http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestion...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#039;s the discussion on LinkedIn: <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers=&amp;gid=41311&amp;discussionID=2065005&amp;goback=.hom.anh_41311">http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestion&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

